The Science of Branding: Why Brands Shape Behavior Beyond Logic

Apple is just a phone. Starbucks is just coffee. Rolex is just a watch. 

Yet people willingly pay more, wait longer, and defend these brands as if they mean something personal. From a purely economic lens, this makes little sense. Rational consumers, in theory, should always choose the best value. In practice, they rarely do.

We like to believe our decisions are logical, but branding operates in a different part of the brain. 

A well-known study conducted by researchers affiliated with Duke University demonstrated this clearly. Participants were subliminally exposed to either the Apple logo or the IBM logo before performing tasks that required creative thinking. Those exposed to Apple consistently performed better on creative tasks.

The explanation wasn’t product superiority or technical knowledge. It was narrative repetition. Apple had spent years reinforcing a story about creativity, individuality, and being different. That story embedded itself so deeply that a logo alone could influence behaviour. This is the real power of branding—it works long after the sale is over.

Brand influence doesn’t stop at preference. It begins to shape identity. Americus Reed, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania who studies identity and marketing, explains that when people choose brands, they are choosing how they want to be perceived. Clothing, shoes, and accessories become social signals, not just functional items.

Choosing Nike over another athletic brand isn’t only about comfort or price. It can represent alignment with performance, ambition, or elite athleticism. Other brands may symbolise resilience or being an underdog. Consumers subconsciously select the option that feels most consistent with their current self-image or aspirational identity.

Once this identification forms, the relationship deepens. Brands stop being products and start feeling like extensions of the self. That’s why people instinctively defend certain brands when criticised. An attack on the brand feels personal, because psychologically, it is. The brand has become part of how they define themselves.

Neuroscience supports this idea. Michael Platt, a professor of neuroscience, marketing, and psychology, explored how people neurologically respond to brands. His research involved scanning the brains of iPhone and Samsung users while they heard positive, negative, and neutral news about both companies.

Apple users showed empathy-related brain activity when hearing news about Apple—similar to the response one would have toward a close family member. Samsung users, interestingly, showed almost no emotional response to news about Samsung itself. Their strongest reactions appeared when Apple received negative news, triggering positive brain responses.

Even more revealing was that participants did not consciously report feeling these reactions. What they said and what their brains showed were completely different. This gap highlights how much of brand decision-making happens below awareness. People are often unaware of how deeply brands influence them.

For digital marketers, this creates both opportunity and responsibility. Branding is not just about differentiation or aesthetics. It is about shaping meaning over time. The danger lies in manipulation, but the upside lies in building brands that genuinely add value to people’s lives.

This is where empathy becomes critical. As Gary Vaynerchuk often emphasizes, most marketing fails because it does not respect the consumer’s time. When brands obsess over selling instead of caring, they create noise rather than connection. The best marketing feels like it was made for the audience, not at them.

Modern platforms give marketers unprecedented access to real consumer thoughts through comments, posts, and conversations. We are living in a golden era of insight, but only if we listen. Brands that win are those that solve problems people already complain about, rather than inventing problems to sell solutions.

Great branding requires patience. It compounds quietly. One of the clearest signs that a brand is working is when growth continues while advertising spend decreases. That means reputation, trust, and word-of-mouth are doing the heavy lifting. Short-term tactics fade, but identity-driven brands endure.

Brands are not disappearing. Even those who claim to reject branding are still expressing identity, often through an “anti-brand” stance. Humans need belonging and meaning. Where institutions once filled that role, brands now often step in. For marketers, the question is not whether branding influences behaviour but how responsibly we choose to wield that influence.

Resources & Studies Referenced (for credibility)

Back To Home